Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Constitution/America_Occupied.txt

Text File | 1996-07-08 | 93KB | 1,656 lines

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------

                        America ... Occupied!

                                By

                         Donald L. Cline

    What follows is a hurried, very rough draft outline of a book
I am writing, and therefore what I say here is "copyright january
1991 by Donald L. Cline," and "all rights reserved."  As you will
note,  there  are  some quotes and other sources  I  have  quoted
specifically; there are some others I have paraphrased as best  I
can  from  memory -- in those cases, please rest assured  I  have
seen the documentation; in most cases I have the documentation in
my files and will find it when I flesh this out more in the  next
draft, and in any case I know where to find the source documenta
tion  when  I  need it.  When I write the  final  manuscript  the
quotes and dates and times and places will be as specific and  as
precise as it is possible to be.  In the interest of getting this
completed quickly and onto the bbs, however, I have not  bothered
to  search out some of the more obscure items for this piece.   I
think you will find more than enough documentation in support  of
the  title, however, and there is more -- lots more --  available
to anyone who will look for it.

Disclaimer:   nothing  I say here is legal advice.   This  is  my
opinion based upon extensive research into the political  history
of  our  nation, who is destroying it, who is getting  paid,  and
why.   The  following  is an exercise of my  right  of  political
expression.

    I'm  am  going to begin with a quotation  which,  I  believe,
accurately expresses the general mood of the founding fathers  of
our  nation (those who were in favor of revolution, at least)  at
the time of our conflict with britain:

     "if ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity  of
servitude  better than the animating contest of freedom, go  home
from  us  in peace.  We seek not your counsels or  arms.   Crouch
down  and  lick the hands which feed you.  May  your  chains  set
lightly  upon you, and may posterity forget ye were our  country
men." -- Samuel adams (1722-1803)

    And I am going to add the following:

                        Warning!

If you use any of your inherited and unalienable rights,  includ
ing those secured to you by the constitution of the united states
of  america, to resist abusive and  unconstitutional  government,
you may be prosecuted and imprisoned as a criminal; you may  lose
your  job; you may lose your home; you may lose your friends  and
family;  you may lose your life, and you will most  assuredly  be
confronted  by any one or more of the several government,  quasi-
government, and non-government agents and agencies (pretending to
represent  government) for your stand.  You must be  prepared  to
accept this adversity as the price you pay for liberty.

If you cannot do this, do not take the first steps!

--  (Included on the first page of the freedom books  offered  by
the  national  commodity  & barter association  (ncba),  8000  e.
Girard  avenue, #215, denver, co 80231, as a benefit  of  member
ship.)

    The  past does not always foretell the future, but those  who
fail  to learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.  We,  as  a
people,  and  as a nation, have been down this path  before,  and
with one exception we have never failed to fall into the trap.

    The one exception was the american revolution.  This was  the
only  time  in  history we, or any people of any  nation  in  the
world,  knew  who  we were fighting, knew we  were  fighting  the
actual  enemy and not his proxy, and knew what we  were  fighting
against (economic and political feudalism) and knew what we  were
fighting for (liberty and equal justice under the law).

    Even  at that, only about 3% of the american population  sup
ported  the  american revolution.  The rest  were  either  tories
(wanting to stay english) or didn't care one way or the other.

    We  won the american revolution against the best-trained  and
most  modern,  in both tactical training and  materiel,  military
machine of the world.  And we won it, primarily, because  england
was distracted by several other brushfires licking at its breech
es,  and  couldn't devote its full attention to us.

   Can you imagine the apoplectic fury of the english lords at the
sheer  effrontery of those rebels?  "My gawd!"  Many  undoubtedly
profaned,  "we are englishmen!  Those yanks are mere rabble!   We
have a right to the riches of the new world; we colonized it!  We
supported  those  damnably expensive colonies through  all  these
years  of drought and famine, and now they have  the  unmitigated
gall  to  tell us to shove off!  This is insufferable!   I  won't
have  it,  I  tell you!"  (I don't do english  lords  very  well;
you'll have to pretend.  But I hope you get my point.)

    England lost a great deal when the american colonies  thumbed
their  nose and went their own way, and I don't believe  the  old
line aristocratic families have ever forgiven us for it.   Ameri
ca,  on the other hand, wasn't doing too well either:  the  arti
cles  of  confederation weren't working well,  primarily  due  to
their  failure  to  address the question of a  stable  medium  of
exchange  that all people could depend upon.  The  history  books
tell us there was also the problem of collecting taxes to pay for
the  national government; the articles had no teeth in  them  and
the various states paid taxes, or didn't, at their whim.

    In actual fact, however, the problem of taxation was  second
ary:  the  real, number-one problem was a fluctuating  medium  of
exchange:  in other words, untrustworthy money.

   How confident would you be in the stability of your world  if
the day before yesterday you bought a loaf of bread for a dollar,
and  yesterday it cost you five, and today three dollars, and  in
all likelihood it will cost you 45 cents tomorrow, and next  week
the price might be nine dollars?  How would you feel if you  were
a  working  tradesman, and this client paid  you  in  connecticut
dollars, and that one paid in massachusetts dollars, and  another
in north carolina dollars, and you knew that pennsylvania dollars
held up pretty well but all the rest would vary in value from zip
to  half face value before you could get to the  bank?

     These were the problems facing our country on the eve of  the
constitutional   convention.   "The  wheels  of  government   are
clogged,  and  we are descending into the vale of  confusion  and
darkness.  No day was ever more clouded than the present.  We are
fast verging to anarchy and confusion."  -- George washington, in
a  letter to james madison on the eve of the constitutional  con
vention.

    The  sole  purpose of the constitutional convention,  as  de
scribed  by  alexander hamilton in a report to congress  in  1786
recommending  that there be a convention, was "to take into  con
sideration  the  trade  and  commerce  of  the  united   states."

Prior  to  the constitutional convention, a man by  the  name  of
roger  sherman wrote a book called "a caveat against  injustice."
The  two remaining copies in existence were located a  few  years
ago  by f. Tupper saussy, and reprinted, with the  re-publisher's
comment that it was positively appalling (and I agree!) that  the
communist manifesto, by a professional bum named karl marx,  had,
down  through  the decades, enjoyed a worldwide  publishing  rate
second  only to the bible, while this book -- arguably  the  most
important book on economic theory ever published, and very  defi
nitely the basis for the economic provisions of the u.s.  Consti
tution -- was suppressed, hidden, burned, and having dwindled  to
only  two fragile and crumbly copies, was completely  unknown  to
the scholars of the 20th century.

    Roger  sherman, by the way, was the only man whose  signature
appears  on all four of the main documents formative of  our  na
tion:  the "declaration of the causes and necessity of taking  up
arms,  july  6,  1775", the "declaration  of  independence,"  the
"articles    of   confederation,"   and   the   "united    states
constitution."   According  to thomas  jefferson,  roger  sherman
wrote the economic-related passages of the u.s. Constitution, and
also (according to thomas jefferson) "never said a foolish  thing
in his life."

    A mere nine months after the u.s. Constitution was  ratified,
the  december 16th, 1789 edition of the pennsylvania gazette  had
this  to  say:  "since the federal constitution has  removed  all
danger of our having a paper tender, our trade has advanced fifty
percent.  Our monied people can trust their cash abroad, and have
brought their coin into circulation."

In  june, 1790, george washington wrote his friend, the  mar
quis de lafayette that "our revenues have been considerably  more
productive than it was imagined they would be.  I mention this to
show  the spirit of enterprise that prevails."   Washington  also
alluded  to the fantastic industry and prosperity and  spirit  of
enterprise  forming the u.s. Economy, based upon gold and  silver
coin  and  not upon intrinsically worthless paper money,  in  his
first state of the union address.

    But  the english lords didn't like it.  They  considered  the
upstart colonies were taking caviar out of their mouths.  The war
of  1812, the so-called "war that no one understood"  was  fought
over  ships  blockading  the u.s. In an attempt  to  disrupt  our
economy.  It finally fizzled out when it was discovered that both
our  economy  and our willingness to fight were too  strong  (and
that britain had repealed the laws causing the conflict two  days
before  the hostilities broke out;  international  communications
were slow.)

    The  monied  international aristocratic cartel,  allied  with
various nations at one time or another, tried seven times between
1812  and 1913 to bring our economy to its knees by unfair  trade
restrictions,  tariffs,  withholding payments  for  our  exports,
quibbling  over interest rates, and even restricting the  coinage
of their own money and the money of their allies.  In every case,
they  found they hurt themselves and the economy of the  rest  of
the entire world, but they couldn't hurt us.  They couldn't bring
us to our knees.

    Oh, we felt it, all right.  Those seven attempts caused seven
economic  "depressions"  in the u.s., and life  was  hard  during
those times.  But the depressions were a whole lot deeper  every
where else in the world, and the only positive result obtained by
the english was a tool of disinformation:  these seven  worldwide
depressions resulted in "official recognition" of what was false
ly described as the "regular boom-and-bust cycles of unrestrained
commerce."  This claim is sheer balderdash: no such cycles  occur
in an economy both unrestrained and unmanipulated.

    The  economy  most beneficial to the producers of  wealth  --
that's us working stiffs, folks -- is the unrestrained economy in
which  there  is  a chronic labor shortage and  there  is  always
something  to do and money to be made if a worker is  willing  to
work.   The economy most beneficial to the elitists -- those  who
consider themselves above common labor and who prefer to  exploit
the labor of others to their own ends -- is the stagnant  economy
in  which  jobs  are scarce, pay and benefits are  low,  and  the
business  owners (and the financiers!) can pick and choose  their
labor,  are not constrained to pay them what they are worth,  and
if  a worker won't play the game by the owner's  (and  ultimately
the  financier's) rules, then the worker doesn't work  and  ulti
mately  starves (which gets him out of the way of  the  political
agendas operated by the financiers).

    Coincident  with the ratification of the constitution of  the
United  States and later ratification of the bill of rights,  and
during the next 122 years to 1913, several worldwide events  took
place:

    1.   The  beginnings of the industrial  revolution  (actually
more  an  increase in the rate of technological  evolution)  were
well  underway  and accelerating by 1790.  This resulted  in  the
emergence  of the "middle class," a development not  particularly
appreciated by the landed aristocracy, and one of the main causes
of the french revolution and other great turmoils in europe,  and
probably  a significant factor among the causes of  the  american
revolution.

    2.  The french revolution occurred between the years of  1789
and 1799, almost coincident with the ratification of our  consti
tution and formation of our new nation.

    3.   The  aforementioned  war of 1812,  fought  over  british
interference with american shipping.

    4.   Karl marx, supported first by  his  financially-strapped
lawyer  father, and later by elitist front-man  frederic  engels,
published  his communist manifesto in 1848, in which he  promoted
the idea that the means of production should not be in the  hands
of  the  people,  but in the hands of  government.   I  recommend
anyone  who wants to know what marx and engels were really up  to
obtain a copy of the communist manifesto, with foreword by  fred
eric  engels  and  introduced by william p.  Fall,  published  by
american  opinion.   Karl marx was a professional  bum  who  bled
everyone  around  him dry including his own  family,  engaged  in
drunken  and  drug-induced rampages and orgies,  and  allowed  at
least one of his own children to die of neglect.

    5.  Abraham lincoln became the first president elected by the
republican party, on november 6, 1860, was re-elected on november
8, 1864, and was shot by john wilkes booth april 14, 1865, only 5
days after the south surrendered.  Never, until the assassination
of  john  f. Kennedy, has the people of america been lied  to  so
thoroughly about the killing of a national figure.  According  to
some  writings  based  upon evidence contained  in  the  national
archives, john wilkes booth belonged to a troupe of actors  tour
ing  the country and using their off-hours to proselytize to  the
public about the wild philosophies of karl marx.  He was said  to
be  mentally-unbalanced (most people were level-headed enough  in
those days to believe that anyone spouting that kind of  nonsense
had  to  be mentally unbalanced).  Apparently he was as  ideal  a
hit-man against lincoln as lee harvey oswald was against kennedy;
and  documents were found in booth's belongings,  containing  the
seal  of a certain bank president, which lended credence  to  the
theory  that  he was hired to do the job.   Why?   Certainly  not
because booth was a virginian, and on the side of the south,  but
rather,  because the bankers wanted lincoln to finance the  civil
war  by borrowing money from the american representatives of  the
banking  cartel, but lincoln refused.  Instead, he paid  for  the
war by selling war bonds to the american people.

    6.  On april 12, 1861, southern artillery shelled fort  sumt
er,  in the harbor of charleston, s.c., and the war  between  the
states  was joined.  It lasted four years, to april 9, 1865,  and
took  more american lives than any war in history.   Contrary  to
the  "conventional  wisdom," often given  excessive  emphasis  in
public  schools, slavery, while an issue presented to the  public
as  the main cause of the war, was actually a  major  side-issue.
The main issue was the economic domination of the industrial- and
banking-based  north over the agricultural,  aristocratic  south,
and  the demand, by the northern states, that the south pay  pro
tective tariffs to the north.

    7.   In  1869, marx formed the "social democratic  party"  of
germany.  What does that tell you?

    8.  The british fabian society was formed in london, england,
in  1884, for the purpose of exporting communism to the  rest  of
the  world under the guise of socialism.  Playwright george  ber
nard  shaw  and author h. G. Wells were very  prominent  members.
(The only difference between a communist and a socialist is  that
the  communist  believes  his ideas can only  be  established  by
violent revolution, whereas the socialist believes his ideas  can
be  established by social reform -- the ideas, in each case,  are
identical.)   it is believed to be the fabian society which  sup
ported the "social democratic party" (there's that bunch  again!)
in russia, resulting in the violently bloody bolshevik revolution
and the rise to power of lenin and his fanatical belief in commu
nism.   It also established the "league of industrial  democracy"
in the united states to expand the teachings of  socialism/commu
nism:   columbia university was one of its most  notable  success
stories, and columbia university has trained over ninety  percent
of  the  educators and education administrators of  our  nation's
public school system ever since.

    9.   My  memory of the details are rather vague, but  it  was
also  around 1900, plus or minus 20 years, that the  "illuminati"
(the eye in the pyramid) group was formed, and also a group which
became  known as the "bilderbergers" after the name of the  hotel
in  which  they  first met as a group.  See back  issues  of  the
spotlight  for  extremely precise details.  My  impression,  from
memory, is that these two groups are pretty much the same  thing,
or  the same group, but that impression could be faulty.  In  any
event  it was these groups -- basically the international  monied
aristocrat banking cartel -- behind the concerted move to get the
federal reserve system installed in america.

    (All these groups are interrelated, I.e., had and have  over
lapping memberships, evolved from one another, etc.  These groups
are  the  precursors to todays' "council on  foreign  relations,"
formed to sponsor obliteration of national boundaries and  estab
lishment  of one world rule, and "trilateral commission,"  formed
to consolidate international banking and commercial interests  by
seizing  political  control of the united states  (direct  quote,
"with  no  apologies," by senator  barry  goldwater).   President
bush,  all of his cabinet, most of congress, most of the  federal
judiciary,  a  great  many federal bureaucrats, and  97%  of  the
publishers  of  major  metropolitan newspapers in  the  u.s.  Are
members  of one or both of these organizations.  Write to  johnny
stewart,  f.r.e.e.,  1807  columbus avenue, box  8616,  waco,  tx
76710.  Include 5 bucks postage/handling for lots of information.

    Meanwhile,  during this period from the ratification  of  the
constitution to 1913, america was being flooded with  immigrants.
And -- except during those hard times brought on by the  overseas
financier-run  governments -- there was always something  for  an
enterprising  and hard-working immigrant to do.  America was  the
land of milk and honey, the land of opportunity.  America was the
land  where even a cotton-farmer or backwoods hick  lawyer  could
become president if he set his mind to it; the land where  woods
men and indian fighters could become senators and congressmen.

    Many immigrants did enter government, which at once was  both
the  strength  and the downfall of our republic:  many  of  those
that did had no appreciation of the finer points of commerce  and
power  developed  by the old world aristocratic  financiers  over
thousands of years to enslave the masses.  They had no  apprecia
tion of how those financial power principles, well understood and
so  effectively brought under control by the framers of our  con
stitution to prevent oppression of the people, could enslave  the
people once more if again unleashed.

   Having failed seven times over approximately one hundred years
of  almost  unrelenting american prosperity  and  expansion,  the
elitists finally succeeded in 1913, and they did so by subterfuge
and  deception:  in the last days of the  congressional  session,
just prior to the christmas break, when most of the senators  and
congressmen  had gone home for the christmas  holidays,  congress
passed the federal reserve act.  The state of ohio was the  pivo
tal vote.

    Only  ohio  was not a state in 1913, and it is  not  a  state
today.  Your encyclopedia will tell you ohio was admitted to  the
union  on march 1, 1803.  However, the congressional  record  re
veals  that  ohio was denied statehood in 1803 --  some  kind  of
dispute over annexation of land not belonging to it.  We can only
guess,  today,  what kind of shenanigans went on in  congress  to
cover  up the illegality of permitting ohio to vote, but it  was,
obviously, covered up.  It is apparent that the enemies of liber
ty were already well entrenched in the u.s. Congress in 1803, and
this  is  confirmed  by thomas jefferson's  complaint  about  the
congress  only ten years after the constitution was ratified:   I
can't  remember  the exact words, but it was to the  effect  that
congress had already thrown away everything the founding  fathers
had fought and died for in the american revolution, all to  their
own  personal gain through greed and avarice and  an  unrelenting
appetite for power.

    (In 1951 a bill was introduced in congress to 'correct'  this
'oversight'  (the  fact that ohio had been denied  statehood):  a
bill  to 'retroactively' make ohio a state as of march  1,  1803.
The  bill was passed, and promptly forgotten [except by a  couple
of  people who have had a lawsuit pending for at least  a  decade
now, and it seems likely it will never be heard].  But that  1951
'law'  is null and void also:  article I, section 9, clause 3  of
the constitution of the united states says:  "no bill of  attain
der or ex post facto law shall be passed.")

                  AMERICA ... OCCUPIED!

                        (Continued)
    Basically  translated from the Latin, "ex post  facto"  means
"retroactive."   Therefore, Ohio is not a State --  period.   For
other  aspects of this deception, and its effects upon  the  pre
sumed legitimacy of the government of the United States, consider
the  fact that a U.S. President must be, according to Article  2,
Section 1, Clause 4 of the Constitution, "a natural-born citizen"
of  the United States, and Ohio -- not one of the several  States
of the United States -- has been the birthplace of a whole  bunch
of U.S. Presidents.

    Moving right along:  The Federal Reserve Act, which unlawful
ly and unConstitutionally delegated the authority of the  govern
ment of the United States to Coin Money to a PRIVATE,  FEDERALLY-
CHARTERED CORPORATION (The Fed is NOT a government agency!),  was
followed  in rapid succession by the Internal Revenue Act  (which
was  struck  down  by the courts as  being  unConstitutional  and
followed almost immediately by the 16th [Income Tax]  Amendment),
and  then  by  the 17th Amendment, which  completely  turned  our
system of government upside down.

    Neither  of these Amendments were ratified, and neither  have
any force or weight of law.  Let's take the 16th first:  A Monta
na man by the name of Red Beckman sponsored a former IRS agent by
the  name of Bill Benson to research the legislative  records  of
all  states which purportedly ratified the 16th Amendment.   Bill
Benson  obtained  CERTIFIED COPIES of those  legislative  records
(which are admissible as evidence in court) and published them in
a  book  called "THE LAW THAT NEVER WAS."  Those  records  reveal
conclusively that out of the 38 States listed on the Congression
al Records as having ratified the 16th Amendment, ONLY TWO  actu
ally  did  so:  the rest either RE-WROTE the amendment  in  their
attempt to ratify (which means they did not ratify the  amendment
proposed  by Congress) or, in at least one case (Kentucky)  voted
to  DEFEAT the bill to ratify and then listed the bill as  having
"carried"  in  the  legislative record on the same  page  as  the
overwhelming vote to defeat!

    Thusly,  the  16th Amendment was never  ratified.   Therefore
Article I, Section 9, Clause 4 of the Constitution remains valid,
with  full  force and weight of law:  "No  Capitation,  or  other
direct,  tax shall be laid unless in proportion to the census  or
enumeration herein before directed to be taken."

    [Bill  Benson, by the way, is currently in prison on  trumped
up tax evasion charges because of his part in the book, and until
word got out and officials were deluged with letters from  patri
ots  around the country, was forced to undergo some kind of  drug
program  that left him bedridden and on the verge of death.   The
last  I heard now, he's sitting up in a wheelchair and  at  least
able to take nourishment.  Public response DOES COUNT!]

    The Income Tax, that tax we are illegally required to pay  in
order to exercise our inherited and unalienable right to work  in
an occupation of common right, does not lawfully exist.  It COULD
not  lawfully exist in any event; the exercise of  inherited  and
unalienable  rights  cannot  lawfully be taxed; to do  so  is  an
infringement  of that right.  But we have to exercise  and  claim
and defend and sometimes die to protect our rights, and we  have
n't  been  doing that nearly enough.  That's why  we  are  losing
them.

    Now  to the 17th Amendment:  The Constitution of  the  United
States  conveys NO POWER to the government of the  United  States
over  private citizens, unless those citizens are 1)  engaged  in
interstate  commerce;  2) a member of the militia of one  of  the
several  States which is actually engaged in the defense  of  the
United  States; or 3) a public official (in which case he  is  no
longer a 'private citizen').

    As aforesaid, the 17th Amendment, which turned our system  of
government  completely upside down and made it possible to  bring
the  full  weight and might of the U.S. government  down  on  any
private  citizen who opposed it, was also not ratified.  Here  is
how the deed was done:

     Article  I  Section 1 of the Constitution  states  that  "All
legislative  powers herein granted shall be vested in a  Congress
of  the  United  States, ...", and then goes  on  to  DEFINE  the
"Congress  of the United States" as "... a Senate and a House  of
Representatives."

    Article  I  Section 2 of the Constitution DEFINES  "House  of
Representatives"  as being "... composed of members chosen  every
second year by the people of the several States, ..."

    Article  I Section 3 of the Constitution DEFINES  "Senate  of
the  United States" as "... two Senators from each State,  chosen
by the legislature thereof ..."

    This arrangement WAS and IS of vital importance to our liber
ty.   It  results in a system of government in which  the  PEOPLE
control  the  STATE  GOVERNMENTS, and the PEOPLE  and  the  STATE
GOVERNMENTS,  as separate entities operating in concert,  control
the  U.S.  government.  Power flows from  the  Sovereign  People,
through  the  Constitution, and splits:  half goes to  the  State
Governments; the other half goes direct to the Government of  the
United  States.  When a majority of the Senate, representing  the
State Governments, and a majority of the House, representing  the
People, agree, then the re-combined power flows to the government
of  the  U.S. to impose a new law and enforce it  --  IF  subject
matter jurisdiction is delegated to the government of the U.S. by
the Constitution in the first place.

    This arrangement is SO vital to our liberty that Article V of
the  Constitution  contains a near-complete  prohibition  against
changing it:  Article V provides the methods by which the Consti
tution may lawfully be amended, and the last sentence of  Article
V specifically states:  "... no State without its consent,  shall
be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate."

    The 17th Amendment, as proposed, and as purportedly ratified,
turned  the  Senate into another House  of  Representatives.   It
provided that Senators would be elected by the popular vote, thus
depriving  the States, as the separate entities they legally  and
constitutionally are, from their suffrage in the Senate.

    Two States, Delaware and (I have the other State somewhere if
you  want it) specifically and expressly denied their consent  to
being  deprived of their suffrage in the Senate: they  voted  the
Amendment down.

    Eight  other  States passively and  silently  withheld  their
consent  to  being deprived of their suffrage in  the  Senate  by
taking no action at all on the proposed 17th Amendment.

    Thus the 17th Amendment was NOT ratified.  Thus, by Constitu
tional  definition (Art. I, Sec. 3) we have no Senate.  Thus,  by
Constitutional  definition (Art. I, Sec. 1) we have no  CONGRESS.
What does this do to all the so-called 'laws' this august body of
imposters has foisted upon the unsuspecting American people  over
the  last nearly 80 years?  It appears to me that it  invalidates
them.

    Also,  appointments  to the Presidential Cabinet and  to  the
Judicial Branch must be 'ratified' by the Senate.  What does  the
non-existent  17th  Amendment do to all those  appointments?   It
appears  to me they were invalidated because there was no  Senate
to consider ratification, much less ratify.

    In  short  form, what does this do to the  existence  of  any
lawful  government  of  the United States at all  over  the  last
nearly  80  years?  In my view, it invalidates  it  with  extreme
prejudice.

    Since  1913, the States, as separate entities with  sovereign
rights of their own, and sovereign RESPONSIBILITIES of their  own
(specifically  to  protect the rights of their  citizens  against
oppression by the federal government), were out of the  equation.
In  one fell swoop, America ceased being a lawful  Constitutional
Republic unique in all the world, with a government deriving  its
lawful  power from the Constitution and the Consent of  the  Gov
erned  (as conveyed by the Constitution), and became a  de  facto
"federal  republic" -- the same kind of government  Britain  has,
Australia has, and most other western nations have, which  derive
their  authority  to govern from the vague and  nebulous  concept
that  the  Elitists just automatically have a "divine  right"  to
govern  because they are better than anyone else,  regardless  of
who is elected.

    The aforementioned abdication of power by the lawful  govern
ment  of the United States has had the direct result that  today,
politicians and bureaucrats and judges alike are of the  opinion,
expressed only privately amongst themselves, that "The  Constitu
tion is dissolved, and is dissolved perfectly."

    Well, I'm sorry, it isn't.  Check that -- I'm NOT sorry,  but
it isn't!  The Constitution is as powerful a document as it  ever
was.  It is the GOVERNMENT of the United States that is dissolved
and is dissolved perfectly, and by its own hand.  However,  until
We, the People, start fulfilling our responsibility to defend the
Constitution and the liberty it compels government to honor,  our
liberty  will  continue  to be degraded and  our  situation  will
continue to deteriorate.

    Until We, the People, require government to obey the  Consti
tution,  We, the People will continue to have an OCCUPATION  GOV
ERNMENT -- one deriving no authority from the Constitution of the
United States, and no authority from the Consent of the Governed,
but  deriving  all its illegal POWER, without  lawful  authority,
from the ACQUIESCENCE of We, the People.

   The  overseas  "federal republic" is the  kind  of  government
where the right to even exist as a citizen flows from the head of
state down through the hierarchy, bypassing the State governments
altogether, to the citizen.  The States exist merely as  catspaws
of  the federal government, collecting taxes from the  citizenry,
forwarding  ALL  that money to the federal government,  and  then
going  hat  in hand to Parliament/Congress  seeking  handouts  to
maintain their operating budget, and getting money not  according
to need or established law, but according to political favors and
political  blackballs and their compliance with  federal  "public
policy."

    Under a "federal republic," national security -- what GOVERN
MENT says is national security, and what the courts call 'compel
ling  need' -- is superior to the rights of anyone and  everyone.
And  anything which threatens to reduce the horrendous  power  of
U.S.  government officials, is, in their view, a threat  to  "na
tional security."

   In the U.S. version of the "federal republic," the only  thing
different is that a private organization, not established by  any
law  and NOT EVEN ESTABLISHED AS A CORPORATION UNDER  CIVIL  LAW,
collects taxes, enters the amounts into ledgers, turns the  money
over  to another private organization, the Federal Reserve  Bank,
to be shredded, and turns the figures entered in the ledger  over
to the federal government.  The amount shredded is entered in the
records as amounts repaid to the Fed; when government wants  more
money  it  borrows  it from Fed-member banks  and  other  private
credit-givers,  and  meanwhile the Fed prints money  in  whatever
amount  the Federal Reserve Board thinks is necessary to  control
the  economy.  The Fed then lends that money to its member  banks
at  interest, who put it into circulation by lending it to  their
customers  --  including the U.S. government and  also  including
foreign  countries which haven't a hope in hell of ever  repaying
it.

    When  those  foreign countries default on  their  loans,  the
banks let them get away with it indefinitely as long as they  pay
at least the interest.  When they stop paying even the  interest,
the  banks  lobby the federal government to give foreign  aid  to
these countries so that they can repay their loans.

    Thus, as usual, the American taxpayer foots the bill -- it is
OUR SUBSTANCE that is being robbed from us by an illegal  organi
zation to give to our illegal government, so our illegal  govern
ment  can  illegally  give the money away  to  foreign  countries
(nothing  in  the Constitution authorizes this), who  may,  some
times, maybe partially, give it back to those U.S. banks, who  in
turn give it back to the privately-owned Federal Reserve Bank.

    And meanwhile we are being oppressed by the horrendous weight
of  not  only all this deficit, but also by the INTEREST  on  all
this deficit, and the Fed has never printed the money with  which
to  pay the interest!  If every single Federal Reserve Note  ever
printed  was turned in to the Fed tomorrow to repay the  national
debt, we would still owe many TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS in interest --
and  there is nothing left to pay it with but the collateral  our
criminal 'government' has put up to secure the debt.

    The  interest  on the national debt is equal  to  an  amount,
today, greater than the sum total value of all real estate  under
the  jurisdiction of the U.S. government, all  improvements  upon
that  real estate, plus our best-prediction total gross  national
product for the next 150 years.

    Guess who owns the Fed?  Through a myriad of financial  hold
ing  companies, international banks, and other fronts, guess  who
ultimately owns all the shares in the federally-chartered private
corporation known as the "Federal Reserve Bank"?

   Answer:  The five richest families of Europe.  The same  fami
lies,  several  generations later, as those  who  considered  the
American  Revolutionaries  as conducting  "sheer  effrontery"  to
their natural masters.  They didn't get mad; they got even.

    But  I  digress.  Back to our muttons:   Immediately  on  the
heels of the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 came  the
beginning  of World War I: "The War To End All Wars."   WWI  cost
the  Allies  337 trillion dollars, most of  which  was  borrowed.
Three guesses from whom it was borrowed!

    Two  years  after  the war ended in 1918,  an  economist  and
British  Baron (what else?) by the name of John  Maynard  Keynes,
who,  according to at least one source never even graduated  from
college, wrote his epic monument to economic fraud.  In this book
he wrote the following passage:

    "By  a continuing process of inflation, governments can  con
fiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth
of their citizens.  There is no subtler, no surer means of  over
turning the existing basis of society than to debauch the curren
cy.  The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on
the  side of destruction, and does it in a manner which  not  one
man  in  a million is able to diagnose." -- THE  ECONOMIC  CONSE
QUENCES OF THE PEACE, 1920, by John Maynard Keynes.

    The  economic  theory  proposed by  this  sophomoric,  myopic
neanderthal  grabbed the attention of the  international  elitist
syndicate  of families, who immediately set  about  incorporating
his theory into the economy of every nation in the world.

    Only  there  was a hitch:  While the  international  elitists
had, through the Federal Reserve Bank, finally managed to acquire
a  modicum  of control over our nation's economy,  it  was  still
limited  by  the fact that the paper money it printed had  to  be
'backed'  by the face value amount in gold or silver  coin.   How
could  it  establish  a "continuing process  of  inflation,"  and
"confiscate,  secretly and unobserved, an important part  of  the
wealth"  of  American citizens as long as American  currency  was
backed by gold and silver coin?

    From 1776 to 1913, for example, the total accumulated  infla
tion rate in America was less than one-tenth of one percent,  and
America  was  the most prosperous and industrious nation  in  the
world,  all because of the Constitutional requirement of a  mone
tary  system based upon precious metals of intrinsic  value.   We
were  also politically the most independent nation of the  world,
because  people  worked and had a right to the  fruits  of  their
labors,  and because their money had intrinsic value, the  people
had greater economic clout than government con artists and  song-
and-dance  men.  Government truly was by the Consent of the  Gov
erned,  and government was painfully aware that it depended  upon
the good will of the working people of America for its  continued
existence.

    How  could  the international syndicate  of  monied  shysters
separate  Americans from that unseemly authority over their  gov
ernment, gain control of the government themselves, and get  even
for  the  stinging slap in the face this  unblushing  rabble  had
administered to them in the American Revolution?

    They  quickly thought of a way.  It would take a little  time
for  their new toehold in America, the Federal Reserve  Bank,  to
settle in and become part of the scenery, and meanwhile the  rest
of  the world was suffering a debilitating and devastating  Great
Depression  while  America seem to prosper, but  they  WOULD  get
even, all right!

    In 1929, the hammer fell and they slapped us down, HARD.  All
they did was slow the printing presses; slow down the  production
of new currency.  Money in circulation decreased; people began to
feel  a  slowdown in the economy; they began digging  into  their
cash reserves to keep going.  To keep their cash reserves solvent
they  put onto the stock market some of their investments  previ
ously withheld, and others, eager to snap them up, depleted  cash
reserves  further.   The buying frenzy of  these  newly-available
stocks  sent  the market through the roof, and as  cash  reserves
became  critical  and  people panicked and sold out,  it  took  a
shrieking nosedive into the cellar.

    This  was  the single, exclusive, one and only cause  of  the
Crash of '29:  the foreign-owned Fed slowed the printing  presses
down  to a near stop.  In one fell swoop the world monied  inter
ests had slapped us down hard for our stinging rebuke to them  in
the American Revolution, imposed the same suffering on America as
was being endured by the rest of the world, and set the stage for
the  removal  of the monetary backing by gold  and  silver  coin.
That,  they knew, would result in the easy acquisition  of  total
political  control over the government of the United  States  and
total economic control over the people of the United States.

    Now  we were hurting.  Now America was no longer  prosperous.
Within  3 years, one out of four American workers had lost  their
jobs.  Many lost their homes due to their inability to pay  their
mortgages.   Breadlines  were  long and somber.   Now  it  became
difficult to make our repayments for the money borrowed to prose
cute  World  War I.  Now the gold going overseas  to  make  those
payments, as well as the gold sent overseas to purchase  imports,
when  other countries had no gold to buy our exports with, was  a
significant  percentage  of the total gold coined by  the  United
States, and we began to suffer from a bad case of "gold drain."

    Along  came  Franklin Delano Roosevelt:  He  and  his  "brain
trust" of close advisors decided the way to keep gold from  flow
ing out of the United States was to remove the gold backing  from
our  currency.   How convenient that this was  exactly  what  the
international banking cartel wanted!  Only problem is, the remov
al  of the gold backing ONLY applies to you and I!  If  you  read
the Gold Reserve Act of 1934, you will find, in the second  para
graph, a clause EXEMPTING the currency of the United States  from
having its backing removed.

    All  that  happened, really, was that  now  government  could
offer "foreign aid" to foreign countries instead of gold.   Mean
while,  no  private individual could go into a bank  or  Treasury
office or Federal Reserve office, as previously, and redeem their
paper money in gold.

    The  Gold  Reserve Act of 1934 also  prohibited  the  private
ownership of gold, thus completely depriving the people of  what
ever economic clout, based upon their gold wealth, they may  have
had to stop government and "quasi"-government criminality.

    The  World Book Encyclopedia, 1964:  "Many of his (John  May
nard Keynes) ideas were included in President Franklin D.  Roose
velt's New Deal program in the 1930's (see NEW DEAL)."

    Since those hurt most by the Crash and Great Depression  were
the  little people who, unable to work due to age  or  infirmity,
were  living on their investments, and since the Crash wiped  out
their  investments, F.D.R. offered the people "Social  Security":
"Here, sign your liberty and soul away on this application, get a
government-issued  Social Security Number so that you too may  be
listed  as a 'Government-owned Commercial Commodity Unit' in  the
files of the Department of Commerce, and government will  provide
for  your  retirement!"  Whoopee! everyone cheered.   (Well,  not
everyone,  but  who  listens to someone who  knows  what  they're
talking about when government is saying the opposite?)

    When  the  Supreme Court began taking a dim view  of  playing
fast  and  loose with the U.S. Constitution, F.D.R. flew  into  a
rage  and  began trying to "pack" the  Supreme  Court.   Congress
didn't  quite  go along with his demands, but he  was  successful
enough that with attrition due to retirement and death in office,
only  two  Justices of the Supreme Court were NOT  Roosevelt  ap
pointees as late as 1944.

                       AMERICA ... OCCUPIED!

                            (Continued)

    (I've  read some of the rulings handed down by the  Roosevelt
Court, and I'll tell you: they are INCREDIBLE.  It is  abundantly
clear that not only were these judges incompetent as to the  law,
they weren't even capable of reading plain English!  The  Consti
tution would say one thing in plain English and they would  rule,
without  a  shred  of precedent or justification,  that  it  said
exactly  the opposite or, alternatively, that it said nothing  at
all  about the controversy in question when it clearly  addressed
the issue directly and to the point.  We still suffer greatly, as
a nation, because of approximately ten years of incompetency  and
severe  leftist ideology on the Supreme Court, and a  significant
measure  of that incompetency and leftist ideology  endures  even
today.)

    Baron Von Rothschild, at that time reputed to be patriarch of
THE most wealthy family in the world and the Capo de Capo of  the
International Banking Cartel, is quoted as having told an  inter
national  conference  of financial interests in 1937:   "Give  me
control  of  a nation's currency, and I care not  who  makes  its
laws."  I cannot help but feel he said it with a very self-satis
fied smirk.

    World War II started in 1939, and F.D.R. couldn't wait to get
the  U.S.  into the thick of it.  His wish was granted  when  the
Japanese hit Pearl Harbor, and if ever the international  banking
syndicate  gave thanks for an ideal opportunity to make a  profit
by  exploiting America's war effort, December 7th, 1941  was  the
day.   The cartel supported all sides of the war; Hitler's  Chan
cellor of the Exchequer was the brother (or brother-in-law,  I've
forgotten which) of the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury;  Standard
Oil (owned by British financial interests [guess who?]) sold  oil
to Germany AND the U.S. up until the last year or so of the  war,
a  'War Tax' was instituted, and a 'Withholding Tax' with a  two-
year  sunset clause was passed to enforce it (you'll note  it  is
still with us; few sage observers of the time figured it would be
otherwise),  and  our debt to the  international  banking  cartel
obliterated the ceiling on the way to the Moon.

    (Note that I do not decry World War II as being anything less
than absolutely necessary, any more than I decry the Persian Gulf
War.   I just object to the filthy profits made out of it by  the
banksters,  and to the continued destruction of our  Constitution
as  a limit on government.  In both cases the war  was  necessary
because  of really bad mistakes and planned  intrigues  conducted
much earlier for the specific purpose of making war necessary.)

    Franklin  Delano Roosevelt died of a cerebral  hemorrhage  on
April 12th, 1945.

    My  encyclopedia strangely ignores F.D.R.'s last  words,  at
tributing  to  him in their place the phrase "I have  a  terrific
headache," but it is worth noting multiple reports that  F.D.R.'s
actual last words, on his deathbed, was a cry of agony:  "Oh,  my
God!  I have betrayed my country!"

    He  sure  did.  In all fairness, F.D.R. was typical  of  that
breed of man who puts compassion for others above principle,  who
rejected  what,  to him, were nebulous (and inedible)  ideals  of
liberty and personal responsibility and a government of law,  not
of men, in favor of overwhelmingly destructive ideals of  "rescu
ing" anyone and everyone who faced any difficulty.  He seemed  to
totally reject the axiom "That Which Doesn't Kill Us, Strengthens
Us."  He was ably assisted in this endeavour by what became known
as  "Roosevelt's  Brain Trust," who were disciples  of  Keynesian
Economics to a man.  His compassionate but oppressive shadow  has
not yet faded from our land, and will not for generations to come
(in the absence of our sudden destruction, of course).

    Moving right along:  On April 18th, 1946, the United  Nations
came  into  being for the purpose of  settling  disputes  between
nations without the necessity of the scourge of war.  It's estab
lishment was concurrent with the dissolution of the old League of
Nations,  founded in 1920 by then President Woodrow  Wilson,  who
was unable to get the United States to join it.  The U.S. was one
of  the  primary members of the U.N., however, and has  paid  the
bulk of its operating costs ever since.

    While  the  purpose  of both the League of  Nations  and  the
United Nations has been to "prevent war," hindsight reveals  that
rather  than  preventing  war, all the U.N. does  is  reserve  to
itself the authority to wage war in the name of "police  action,"
and it does so in a manner insuring that the REAL instigators  of
the  conflict do not have to enter into the fighting -- the  U.N.
provides the proxies to prosecute the fight so the real  protago
nists don't have to get their hands and their countries bloodied.
Usually  the  proxies sent to fight consist of  U.S.  forces  and
ignorant, brainwashed hordes of people funded and advised by  the
Soviet Union.

    The  Korean Conflict, the Viet Nam Conflict, the  Nicarauguan
Conflict,  the  El Salvador Conflict, and now  the  Persian  Gulf
Conflict,  all meet this definition:  we send our young men  (and
women) into harm's way to fight someone else's fight and to  make
a fortune for the members of the International Banking Cartel.

    To  the  banksters, it matters not who wins or loses,  or  if
anyone  does.  It matters only that the war drags on, costing  us
billions.  The longer it goes on, the better for them.  If Commu
nism, which the Fabian Society exported to the rest of world, had
achieved  dominance in the world over capitalism, then  they  (or
another organization they created) would start exporting capital
ism.  It is not right or wrong; it is not liberty or  oppression;
it  is  the conflict between the two which matters  to  them  and
which fills their lives with money and power and influence.  They
play  both  sides of every fence.  And We, the  People  work  and
slave and sacrifice in unwitting involuntary servitude to support
not our own desires for a reasonably comfortable existence, or  a
better  world  for our children, but to support  the  insatiable,
rapacious appetite of those of wealthy international ambitions.

THE PRESENT:

1.  The "Keep The People In The Program" program:

    The Internal Revenue Service is another illegal outgrowth  of
the shenanigans of 1913 and is NOT a government agency.  Title 31
United States Code, Chapter 3, Subchapter 1, lists all the  agen
cies,  departments, bureaus, "services," etc., under the  control
and authority and responsibility of the Department of the  Treas
ury.  According to a House report it is a complete list, but  the
so-called "Internal Revenue Service" is not listed.

    It's too complex to go into here, but suffice to say that  if
the  IRS  WERE a government agency, it would be  struck  down  as
unConstitutional.   That's  why it is not:  Since it  is  a  non-
government  entity,  the  protection of rights  afforded  by  the
Constitution  may be ignored.  Businesses, especially  those  who
have asked permission of government to exist (corporations, among
others) have no rights anyway because they are not natural  indi
viduals;  they  are  "Law Merchants"  or  "commercial  entities."
Government has the power to control their every action, including
whom  they may hire and whom they may not.  They  are  prohibited
from hiring "natural individuals at law" by government's require
ment that their every "employee" have a government-issued  serial
number (Social Security Number.)

    So,  basically, you can't get a job unless you are a  govern
ment-owned  and serial-numbered Commercial Commodity  Unit.   But
you  are not COMPELLED to become a  government-owned  serial-num
bered  Commercial Commodity Unit, and therefore if you do so  (to
enjoy  the  luxury of feeding your family, for example)  you  are
doing  so  VOLUNTARILY.  If you do so voluntarily, then  you  are
under CONTRACT to government and by the essence of that contract,
you,  too,  are a "Law Merchant" and/or "commercial  entity"  and
government has absolute power over your every action.  "And gee,"
government apologizes, "if you aren't a natural individual at law
(one  whose rights are sovereign over government whim),  then  we
aren't  going to hear your complaint that the IRS has  no  lawful
authority over you.  It has authority over you because we WANT it
to  have  authority over you, and without any  interference  from
'law' -- after all, we are now a nation of very powerful men, not
of law."

    (The way fight this [it is not a way out, but it gives stand
ing  to your fight] is to not do so voluntarily.  Don't  sign  up
for  it unless you absolutely have to, and then do it  under  du
ress.  More information upon request.)

    In 1964, President "Tricky Dicky" Nixon pulled the same stunt
as F.D.R. pulled in 1934, for the same given reasons:  he removed
the SILVER backing of the paper dollar.  From that moment on, our
currency has been totally worthless:  it costs one and  one-third
cent  to print a 'dollar' bill of any denomination, and the  gov
ernment  of  the United States (and therefore the People  of  the
United States) owe the Federal Reserve Bank one dollar,  mandated
by law as a specified measure of gold or silver, for each  dollar
amount of Federal Reserve Note bills so printed.  Plus  interest.
(A 'note' is defined by law as an 'I.O.U.')

    Now  you might understand why we have so many huge  areas  of
the  United  States designated as "wilderness" areas, not  to  be
improved  or developed:  these areas are collateral for  what  we
owe the foreign-owned Federal Reserve Bank!  I noted once  again,
for  example,  as  soon as the recent humongous  budget  and  tax
increase was passed, another 3800 acres of Arizona was set  aside
as  "Wilderness."  You may have heard of similar events  in  your
own  State, with any connection to the budget conveniently  omit
ted.   Less  than 4% of the land area of Arizona  is  in  private
hands; the rest is in either corporate or government hands -- and
Arizona is one of the 'GOOD' States in this regard!

    There is a problem with Keynesian Economics which  completely
escaped our ivory-tower pseudo-intellectual John Maynard  Keynes:
Sooner  or  later, you have to pay the piper.  The  only  way  to
stave  off  having to pay the piper (having your  whole  economic
house  of  cards collapse upon you), is  to  either  periodically
enter  into a "limited" war (which gets rid of a lot of  hardware
and excess population and requires hard work to repay the accumu
lated debt and still make a living) or to continually be  opening
new debt markets to exploit and drain dry:

    In  1975-76, our nation was just about SATURATED  with  debt.
Hardly anyone owned anything; practically everyone was in hock to
the  hilt, the citizens, the businesses, and the  government  in
cluded.   There  were even movements afoot to open up  credit  to
teenagers in an effort to expand the debt market.

    So,  assuming the mantle of the hardy pioneer  exploring  new
lands,  our  'own' (Bllicchh!  God, I hated saying  that!)  David
Rockefeller,  Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations  (CFR)
and  North American Chairman of the Trilateral  Commission  (TC),
and  front  man for the European Financial  Empire  (the  banking
cartel),  paid a private (non-State) visit to the  Soviet  Union.
Shortly  thereafter,  billboards  extolling the  virtues  (!)  of
Mastercard and VISA began appearing in Moscow.  Within a very few
short months, a really sweetheart of a nice guy (and former  head
of  the KGB!) by the name of Mikhail Gorbachev popped up  in  the
Soviet Union and started sweet-talking the West.

    Along  about the same time, a wimpy sweetheart of a nice  guy
(and  former head of the CIA!) by the name of George Bush  popped
up in the U.S. of A and began sweet-talking the Soviets.

    George  Bush  is the first President in American  history  to
enter the Oval Office KNOWING IN ADVANCE who his masters were; he
had  been groomed in politics for years and years by  those  mas
ters, and agrees with their agenda -- he wants to be one of those
"masters" himself.  All the previous Presidents, a naive actor by
the  name of Ronald Reagan included, didn't find out until  after
they   were in the Oval Office.  In Reagan's case,  for  example,
his advisors managed to cover up his lack of control while  main
taining his image as the "cutting back on government"  President,
and  meanwhile  he signed a half-dozen or more  bills  increasing
federal  intrusion  into  the private financial  affairs  of  the
People:  including the infamous TEFRA Act, which requires you  to
I.D. yourself and give your personal data, for later followup  by
the IRS, if you decide to sell any precious metals.

    President  John F. Kennedy didn't find out until  almost  two
years into his term of office -- or perhaps he found out  immedi
ately and refused to accept the facts until nearly two years into
his  term.   At any rate, ten days before his  assassination,  he
gave  a speech at Columbia University in which he stated that  he
had learned the Office of the President was under the control  of
organizations  and  individuals outside the purview  of  American
politics, and that before he left office he would have to "inform
the  American People of his (the President's) plight."  Ten  days
later he was dead.  Very shortly after that, and very convenient
ly, the man who purportedly shot him was also dead.  It is doubt
ful  the truth of that assassination in terms of who the  trigger
man  was, who the back-up man was, who set up the fall  guy,  and
who got paid and by exactly whom will ever be known.

    Concurrent  with the construction of oil fields  in  Alaska,
circa late 1960's to early 1970's, we had an oil embargo  against
us  -- remember that?  Remember the oil tankers sitting  off  the
coast waiting weeks to unload, and not doing so, while cars lined
up  for blocks at the gas pumps and the cost of  gasoline  jumped
from around 25-35 cents a gallon to well over a dollar?

     What was the objective of that exercise?  The objective  was
fourfold:   1)  to get the cost of U.S. gasoline  firmly  over  a
dollar a gallon, closer to what Europeans were paying for it  (of
which  well over half of that cost is taxes); 2) to give  greater
importance  to the completion of the Alaskan Oil Fields  and  the
Oil  Pipeline;  and  3) paradoxically, to  give  President  Jimmy
Carter  a  strong  incentive to throw every  stumbling  block  he
could, in the form of EPA regulations and others, in front of the
efforts by the oil companies to develop the Alaskan Fields.  (And
4,  the 'Elitist Syndrome':  Elitists are extremely annoyed  when
'mere rabble' (that is, non-elitists) drive around in big  flossy
Yank  Tanks  and other expensive energy-consuming flash  cars  --
after  all,  the understated manifestation of wealth of  a  Rolls
Royce limosine isn't worth much if your gardener drives a  Cadil
lac  or  Pontiac or Oldsmobile and its costs him less  than  your
Rolls costs you.  [I mean, Gawd, Jenkins, the EFFRONTERY of these
Yanks!])

     There was, reportedly, enough oil under the Alaskan shelf to
fill the energy needs of the U.S. for 200 years.  Why was there a
necessity  of  costing the oil companies so much?  So  that  they
would eventually give up and sell out to Japanese (and  Arabian!)
investors,  SO  THAT  NOW WE HAVE TO BUY OUR OWN  OIL  BACK  FROM
FOREIGNERS!

     In short, the objective was to keep us from becoming  energy
independent.   If  we became energy independent, we  wouldn't  be
interested in throwing billions of dollars and who knows how many
American lives away fighting an illegal war in the Persian  Gulf.
Think  about  it.  The puppet-masters engage in  VERY  long-range
planning.

     Read Hal Lindsey's book on the Alaskan Oil Fields; he was  a
Chaplain up there.  I wish I could remember the name of the book;
I thought I had a copy.

     In  1984, President Jimmy Carter signed a classified  Execu
tive Order authorizing the construction of some 25 "prison camps"
(concentration  camps) capable of housing up to 25,000  prisoners
each,  spread throughout the United States.  Most of  these  were
built  on  military reservations.  The program was known  by  the
codename  "REX '84," and only came to light when some middle-  to
high-ranking  military  officers leaked the  information  to  the
underground  press.   They did so because the creation  of  these
camps raised, in their mind, serious constitutional issues.  When
questioned by the press, the administration passed off the neces
sity  for these camps as the expected results of the "drug  war,"
an  explanation which satisfied no one except perhaps  the  lick
spittle mass media.

    A  map  and listing of the location of these camps  was  pub
lished by the UPRIGHT OSTRICH a few months ago, and by the  SPOT
LIGHT  a  few  months before that.  I believe  these  camps  were
established to deal with the extreme civil turmoil, bordering  on
revolution or more so, which will result when America is  brought
into  the Internationalist's "New World Order" (one-world  dicta
torship  government) now touted by George "Renegade" Bush as  the
end-all  to be-all of world problems, and into which  his  middle
east  adventurism (regardless of its manufactured  necessity)  is
now pulling us headlong.

    In March/April of 1990, Ambassador Fitzgerald, he of  extreme
Washington  influence in political and economic  (banking!)  cir
cles,  wrote a "White Paper" (opinion paper) on the necessity  of
disarming  Saddam Hussein's burgeoning military machine.  At  the
same time, Senator Bob Dole and his entourage travelled to  Bagh
dad  to  request that Saddam disarm "in the interests  of  Middle
East  stability."   Saddam declined on the  grounds  that  Israel
maintains an arsenal of 100 nuclear weapons and delivery systems.
Senator  Dole then returned to Washington and immediately  intro
duced  the "Dole Initiative," cutting off all food purchases  (up
to  $3  billion a year) by Iraq.  Britain did  exactly  the  same
thing  at  the same time at the behest of  the  Internationalists
(who,  of course, were also behind Fitzgerald's White  Paper  and
Dole's  trip to Iraq and Dole's subsequent reaction  to  Saddam's
rebuff.)

    As reinforcement for the Dole Initiative, Fitzgerald's "White
Paper" was published and circulated in Congress as the Initiative
was introduced.

     The U.S. Congress also wrangled over the national budget  for
a LONG time and finally passed one that was NO LESS THAN TWO  AND
ONE-HALF  PERCENT BIGGER than any budget ever passed before,  and
this  under circumstances which made such a large budget  totally
unnecessary  EVEN IF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAD THEIR WAY  ALL  THE
WAY  DOWN THE PAGE!  The excuse given was the "deficit"  and  the
"national debt," both of which are serious problems, but  neither
of which will EVER be solved by raising taxes, and they know  it.
This  budget  was passed to finance the Gulf War  THEY  KNEW  WAS
COMING.

    I  therefore submit that Saddam Hussein was the ideal  target
for the Internationalist's scam and was manipulated into invading
Kuwait.   Now, I do not deny for an instant the fact that  Saddam
had  just completed (without resolution one way or the other)  an
8-year war with Iran, and instead of fighting that war and build
ing  his military machine he COULD have been putting  that  money
back into food production and other economic elements of his  own
country.   But  Saddam  is Saddam:  he did not  improve  his  own
country's economy; he built a war machine, and he tested his  war
machine  for eight years against Iran to enable his  soldiers  to
gain combat experience.  That is why he was the ideal pawn of the
Internationalists  and THEIR pawns, the British and U.S.  govern
ments.  The other Coalition partners went along with us primarily
because their own narrow focus perceived Saddam as a threat,  and
also because the U.S. government bought 'em off.

    From the Internationalists' point of view, the purpose of the
Gulf  Crisis  is to 1) run the U.S. economy deeper into  red  ink
than it has EVER been before; 2)  to deepen the U.S. recession --
perhaps  into a full-fledged Depression; 3) to make the  American
worker cry out ONCE AGAIN for relief in the form of more  oppres
sive  laws to redistribute the wealth from the Middle Class  into
the  Poverty Class (the Elitists can't STAND the existence  of  a
Middle Class; it threatens their authority); and 4) to expose  us
to  international  terrorism  in hopes of getting  us  to  accept
draconian  firearm  control laws because their plan is  going  to
come apart like an egg in a blender if Americans are still  armed
when the crunch comes.

    The "crunch," by the way, was planned as far back as 1941:  A
map surfaced in 1941, purportedly from sources within the  inter
national  cartel,  which showed the entire world carved  up  into
"Regions" not obeying any national borders existing then or  now,
and including plans revealing that each region was to be assigned
troops  from  different  areas of the world (so  they  would  not
identify  with  the locals) to "keep order."  The  map  was  also
published  in the UPRIGHT OSTRICH a few months ago, and I  recom
mend  obtaining  a  copy and comparing it to  the  ten  "Regions"
established  in  the  U.S. by the  Federal  Emergency  Management
Agency (FEMA) for "administrative" purposes.

                    AMERICA ... OCCUPIED!

                         (Continued)


    Russian  advisors  orchestrated the other side in  Korea  and
Viet Nam, and (of course) in El Salvador and Nicaraugua, and  now
we're doing it again in the Persian Gulf:  We are fighting anoth
er  war  against a Russian surrogate.  If there is  a  difference
(and  I  am not sure there is) it APPEARS as  though  Russia  has
abandoned its surrogate in this case.  Don McAlvany ("Don McAlva
ny's  Intelligence Report") claims that there is  no  difference;
that  Russia had 10,000 troops in Iraq when Iraq invaded  Kuwait,
and has 7,000 troops there now.  (I doubt these numbers; we would
have heard reports of it by now -- maybe . . . (or maybe not).)

    He also claims the invasion of Kuwait and the defensive lines
were designed by Russia's top tactical warfare general, and  that
Saddam  is  being  guarded by a  company  of  Russian  Spetsnatz.
Either  or  both of these are possible, even  though  we  haven't
heard of it.

    He  also  claims that 24 nuclear-tipped ICBM  missiles  which
were  in E. Germany when the Berlin Wall came down are not  there
now,  and they are not in Europe, and they are not in the  Soviet
Union.   (I don't know how he 'knows' the missiles are NOT  some
where, but well . . . maybe.)  His inference is that they may  be
in Iraq, though he is quick to point out that he has no  evidence
that they are.

    I  am  not overly concerned about this even if  they  are  in
Iraq;  these  are  Inter-CONTINENTAL  ballistic  missiles:   they
wouldn't  work against forces as close as our troops (well,  with
extremely  accurate targeting they might be sent out  into  space
for  an hour or so and then return, but targeting would  be  VERY
difficult.)   I  doubt they could be targeted there and  I  doubt
they could be targeted here without months of computer  ballistic
calculations  (the way things are going, they may have months  to
calculate  ballistics!).  But, I think we would have heard  some
thing about these, too, if they were in the war theater.

    However,  those  missiles  might be elsewhere,  in  a  region
already  ballistically  calculated for a trajectory  to  mainland
U.S.  I mention this only to be honest about the possibilities; I
really  don't  believe we are in for a  significant  nuclear  ex
change.   The reason is simple:  There are too many plums in  the
pie,  for the world Elitists, to allow the pie to be burned to  a
cinder.   But accidents do happen, and people do lose their  tem
pers, and some people do insist upon engaging in that "final  act
of defiance."

    One  is reminded that Nostradamus predicted, according to  at
least one interpretation, that Russia would bomb the hell out  of
the  West Coast of the U.S. and then leave us alone -- i.e.,  not
follow  up with invasion or other engagement.  For some reason  I
have  not  been  able to explain or justify, even  to  myself,  I
expect that prediction to come true -- but I don't know when, and
I  don't  think it will be soon, and I have nothing of  any  sub
stance  at all to support my dark suspicion that it  will  happen
eventually.

    Soviet Chess Champion Gary Kasparov, writing in the April/May
1990 issue of GLASNOST, published by the Centre for Democracy  in
the USSR (358 West 30th St., Suite 1-A, New York NY 10001) [which
article  served as notes for his address to the  Second  Biennial
RAND-Hoover Symposium, and was reprinted in THE CANADIAN INTELLI
GENCE  OBSERVER (Bag 78, High River, Alberta T0L 1B0) and in  the
UPRIGHT  OSTRICH  (The Order of the Upright Ostrich,  P.  O.  Box
11691, Milwaukee, WI 53211] says that the West is mistaken if  it
believe  Gorbachev EVER had intentions of liberating  the  Soviet
Union  from  Communism.   He says that  Gorbachev's  conflict  is
between  the New Communism (represented by Gorbachev at  the  top
post  of the New World Order) and the Old Communism,  represented
by  Moscow's  Old  Guard of hard-line Communists.   He  says  the
demonstrations of the people in the Baltic States is not  because
they  have  found courage, and not because  Gorbachev  gave  them
"permission"  to  demonstrate  and then took it away  --  it  is,
rather, because they have lost all hope of peaceful reform.

    He  says  that  if the West gives aid, it must  be  given  to
democratic institutions within the USSR and not the State itself,
or if given to the State, it must be conditioned upon the  scrap
ping of the Central Planning Authority of the Communist Party and
the  actual  recognition of individual rights  by  the  Communist
Party.   He  says that the people of the USSR WILL  regain  their
freedom  regardless  of whether we aid them or aid the  Party  or
offer no aid at all -- but if we aid the Party or offer no aid at
all, tens of thousands of people will die in the conflict and the
Russian People will not soon forget our betrayal.

    Also, of course, the attempted assassination of the Pope  was
a KGB plot, just as McElvany said it was a week after it happened
and  as it was admitted a year later.  The assassination  attempt
was because the current Pope ALSO sees himself as filling the top
post  in the "New World Order."  The Vatican, believe it or  not,
is a contender to the level of Superpower.

    So  you see, the entire WORLD is reaching critical mass,  not
just the Persian Gulf.


                    AMERICA ... OCCUPIED!

                         (Continued)

    BEFORE   you  read  this  file,  PLEASE  go  back  and   read
'America.1' through 'America.4' in the FILES section.  What I  am
about  to say will make a lot more sense to you, and carry a  lot
more  weight,  if you do.  Besides, I think YOU will be  able  to
more accurately predict events in areas I haven't covered if  you
know the background.

    As  I said at the end of the last File, 'America.4,' "Do  you
see?   The entire WORLD is reaching critical mass, not  just  the
Persian  Gulf."  Keep that in mind, and especially keep  in  mind
the strong factor of unpredictability in wartime, and  ESPECIALLY
that unpredictability among Allies who support us mainly  because
we  bought 'em off.  It has been suggested by some astute  Middle
East  advisors that all Saddam Hussein has to do is make a  peace
offer  to  King  Faud, and offer him part of  Kuwait,  and  Saudi
Arabia will politely, and forthwith, ask the U.S. to go home.

    Bush certainly isn't prepared for that.  But then, he  should
know better than to stick his beak into someone else's argument.

    If,  somehow,  the  world does not reach  critical  mass  and
explode  in our face in the next two years, THERE WILL BE  a  New
World Order within five years.  United Europe will become the new
'hegemon'  of  the world; THE Super Power.   America's  influence
will decline virtually to that of a Third World Nation because we
will  have  wasted  our next five hundred years or  so  of  gross
national  product on an illegal (by Constitutional Law)  war  the
Arab  sympathizers  of Saddam Hussein are  already  calling  "the
Hundred  Year  War."  I do not call this a "theory";  I  consider
this a FAIT ACCOMPLI -- there is no chance of it NOT happening if
the world doesn't mostly self-destruct in the meantime.

    I  have before me a copy of an article published in the  Dec.
31,  1990 issue of U.S. News & World Report, by David Lawday,  in
Europe, titled "EUROPE WITHOUT THATCHER", and subtitled  "America
Is  Dead Wrong To Think Things Won't Change."  The  article  con
firms  again the fact that Margaret Thatcher was forced  out  be
cause she refused to surrender Britain's sovereignty to  European
Unity (the European one-third of the 'New World Order').  It goes
on to say, and I quote:

    "Since  1992 popularly caught on as the slogan  for  European
integration,  the  timetable has had a one-date look.   In  fact,
1991 now becomes the key year in which EC members will hammer out
new  treaties  locking  themselves into  monetary  and  political
union.   Then follows completion of a common internal  market  at
the  end  of 1992, and, at the start of 1994,  the  launching  of
streamlined  unity  in  the form of common  foreign  policy,  the
foundations  of  a  common  defense  and  a  start  on  a  common
currency."

    The  world,  she is a-changing, folks, and  it  is  extremely
doubtful  there  is  a danged thing any of us can  do  about  it.
About all we can do is keep our eyes open, our powder dry, and be
ready to duck.  It won't help to cut and run; there won't be  any
place  to run to.  We can expect some or all of the following  to
occur over the next couple of years or so:

    1.  We will see increased calls for laws banning the  private
ownership of firearms, and even unilateral Executive or  Legisla
tive  action to this purpose in direct opposition to the will  of
the  people  -- "in the interests of public safety  and  national
security,"  of  course.  Rigid, draconian gun  control  laws  are
absolutely  essential  to the Elitists' plan and  they  know  it.
Otherwise,  they  know, sooner or later their house of  cards  is
going to come tumbling down and bury them under it.

    2.   We  will  see increased instances  of  Executive  Branch
indictment of Legislative Branch members at the federal and state
levels,  the objective being to de-stabilize the tripartite  con
stitutional element of government and eventually do away with the
legislative branch altogether, or at least so castrate it that by
all  measurable criteria, we again have a monarchy -- even if  it
is  a  monarchy by unelected committee.   Before  then,  however,
while  these  Executive Branch assaults against  members  of  the
Legislative  Branch  are going on at both the State  and  Federal
levels (and in most cases are RICHLY deserved!), there will be  a
shift  toward concentrating on State Legislatures, and  more  and
more  upon State Executive officers.  The object here is  to  de-
stabilize the State governments and get the people really annoyed
at  their  State  government officials -- then  the  people  will
support the dissolution of States altogether, in favor of the ten
Federally-managed Regions desired by the de facto Federal Govern
ment.

    3.   We will see institution of a "War Tax," and I  won't  be
surprised  to see an additional "War Sur-Tax" on top of the  "War
Tax."   (I saw a table of figures recently purportedly  from  the
recent U.S. Census.  According to this table, a person without  a
high  school education earns around 9400 frns a year,  and  takes
home about 5100 of it.  An Engineer or Scientist or Chief  Execu
tive  Officer may earn as much as 51,000 a year, and  takes  home
about 48,000 of it.  Makes it obvious their taxation  priorities,
doesn't it?)

    (One  of the primary goals of this manufactured war is  taxes
-- not merely another increase, but I'm talking about a 'grinding
the  people  into the dirt' level of taxation; ultimately  --  if
they  can deprive us of our weapons -- a taxation rate of 90%  or
more.   Of course, this means an economy not worthy of the  name,
but  that's  okay to them -- they don't care whether  the  people
make it or not so long as they get everything the people make and
have the political enforcement machine to force us to make more.

    4.   We will see further deterioration of what we  regard  as
our "rights:"  Stops for random drug testing, for example,  which
will  gravitate  into searches for  "subversive  literature"  and
other  "contraband" such as MONEY:  So-called "laws" are  already
in place permitting federal enforcement goons to confiscate  cash
in excess of 5-10,000 frns if found on an individual, whether  in
legal possession or not, and in most cases the money will not  be
returned.   Being  required to have "travel papers"  to  cross  a
State  line, for another example, to prevent the free  travel  of
terrorists  (of course).  Trials on charges of Sedition, the  one
'crime' Thomas Jefferson said could never be a crime in the  U.S.
Increased  emphasis  on the collection of taxes, with  even  more
horrendous powers unlawfully delegated to officers of the Illegal
Racketeering  Service (IRS).  Greater control of interstate  com
merce, to better control what areas (regions) get essential items
like food, etc., to control dissent.

    Requirements  that  individuals out of work  because  of  the
'Recession' (Depression) not receive unemployment benefits unless
they go to work at whatever dirt job government says needs  doing
('Workfare' has already been instituted in some States, requiring
welfare  recipients to go to work if they want welfare --  not  a
bad plan, since welfare is illegal anyway, but the problem arises
when  a  free American is REQUIRED to work 'in the  interests  of
national security.'  This is pure and simple enslavement, and Red
China has required this of their people for years.)  Etc., etc.

    5.  We will see further indications that the illegal de facto
government of our country, whom we elected (we think; sometimes I
have doubts), are not accountable to the People OR to the Consti
tution,  but are accountable only to foreign political  organiza
tions such as the United Nations and 'New World Order.'

    6.  We will see the introduction of the "New Money"  designed
with some electronic means built in so that every federal reserve
note  (frn) can be kept track of in every transaction every  time
it goes through a bank account.  (That way you don't need to file
a "return;" the IRS will just send you a bill each year.)  Before
that, there will also be increased surveillance of bank  accounts
and  all transactions in an effort to curtail "money  laundering"
-- an Elitist euphemism for any financial transaction, even those
otherwise  perfectly legal, they don't know about and can't  tax.
The political, legal, and actual physical machinery, and  person
nel,  are already in place to scrutinize every  transaction  that
goes  through  any financial institution in America and  most  of
those  overseas,  and these operations are being given  more  and
more funding to accomplish their mission.

    7.   We will see increasing use of plastic credit  cards  for
every kind of purchase imaginable; even purchases between private
individuals.  Another way to keep track of our financial  activi
ties.   [In Shanghai, China, right now, you cannot buy  groceries
with cash -- you MUST have a 'credit card' (debt card).]  Eventu
ally it will be illegal to use cash or barter for any transaction
-- according to Don McAlvany, it will be illegal to do so  within
the decade.

    8.   And, on top of all this, we will see terrorism from  the
Middle  East to justify all the rest of it.  If there  isn't  any
terrorism,  our occupation government will find it  necessary  to
create some.  This includes the possibility of chemical, biologi
cal,  and/or  nuclear attacks, though they will not be  across  a
broad  front -- they will be individual and isolated, to keep  us
scared  and ready to follow orders, but not dead.  (Most  of  us,
anyway.)

    There  will  also  be the possibility --  probability  --  of
actual nuclear exchanges in a very limited fashion, just to  keep
us from believing the nuclear threat is all a government hoax.

    In  one area I disagree with Don McAlvany:  He seems  to  be
lieve  our government would like to keep our economy  going,  and
that  the  Fed (and its Elitist owners) would like  to  keep  our
economy going, and McAlvany explores things Bush COULD do to help
the  economy, and says Bush might be successful if he does  these
things and is lucky.

    I don't think the Elitists want our economy to "keep going."

    For example, America comprises about 2% of the world  popula
tion,  but  consumes about 25% of the world's oil.  I  think  the
Elitists want to bring us to a complete halt.  I think they  want
to  reduce  our consumption to about 2%, and increase  their  own
consumption to improve the European standard of living, and  make
us pay for it.  I think they want to do to us what they did to us
in 1929, only worse:  Slap us down so hard we beg for relief, and
then  they will give us relief (through the one-world  government
puppets)  by telling us what jobs they want us to do, when to  do
it, where to do it, and how much of a subsistence-level living we
will  make  when we do it, and how many times we're going  to  be
shot if we don't do it.

    I  believe this is a very high-stakes game they are  playing,
and their objective is no less than total, absolute,  unrelenting
totalitarian  control over the entire planet.  Once they  achieve
that,  the only conflicts in the world will be in the  boardrooms
and on the secretarial couches, unless they decide to hold a  war
-- just for the Roman Games amusement of it all, you see.

    Once  they bring us to a complete halt, they can dictate  the
rules  we survive by -- if we let them.  And our occupation  gov
ernment will do everything in its power to make sure we let them.

    So  what  can  we do about all this?  Not a hell  of  a  lot,
unfortunately -- we should have been vigilant and laying down our
lives for liberty all these decades, but we've been too interest
ed in the good life.  We've let them sneak up behind us and put a
noose  around our neck.  But there are things we can do, even  as
individuals,  which will help.  As Mother 'O'  (Upright  Ostrich)
says,  "one  person doing SOMETHING is better  than  250  million
doing  NOTHING."  (I think Ann Landers and/or Abigail  Van  Buren
said  the  same thing.)  And who knows,  as  things  deteriorate,
maybe these ideas will snowball:

    Never,  EVER give your Social Security Number for any  reason
other  than getting a job, and don't do that unless you have  to,
and  do it then only "under duress."  It is against the  law  for
any  agency to compel a SS# number in exchange for  any  service,
and  they can be fined 1,000 frns if they do, and if the fine  is
levied, the fine is paid to the victim.

    Never,  EVER give ANYONE, and certainly not any public  offi
cial  or  agency,  ANY private information  about  yourself  just
because  they  ask for it.  Here 'while back, for  example,  some
jerk  in  the  Arizona State Legislature  introduced  a  bill  to
"protect"  runaway  minor children by requiring  ALL  public  and
private  school students to provide evidence of identity  in  the
form of a birth certificate, upon pain of the school  authorities
"turning  the  case over to law enforcement  for  investigation."
Enough  to scare the hell out of almost any dimwit,  right?   The
bill passed, of course, and we were duly notified of our "respon
sibility"  in  this matter.  We wrote back and  told  the  school
officials that if and when the law enforcement agencies  acquired
"reasonable  probable cause" to believe our child was a  runaway,
THEN  they  had  legal cause to "investigate,"  and  not  before.
Until then, any further attempt to intrude upon our privacy would
be  responded  to with a lawsuit under Titles 18 and  42  of  the
United States Code.  Never heard a another word from 'em.

    The  above  rule even applies to the U.S. Census,  which  the
Constitution  empowers the government to perform for the  purpose
of COUNTING PEOPLE (to adjust Congressional representation),  and
nothing  more.  Accordingly, we gave our names only and  declined
to answer all the rest of those incredibly ridiculous and  intru
sive questions which do absolutely nothing but inform  government
as  to  how much it can squeeze the people for taxes  during  the
next ten years.

    We  received one notice that we would be visited by a  census
taker,  to  which we responded by saying that we had  mailed  the
form  in  (which we had).  Never heard another word.   You  don't
think they WANT their lack of authority tested in court, do  you?
Of course not.

    GET OUT OF YOUR BANKS!!!  Close all credit accounts as quick
ly  as possible.  Stop giving government free access to all  your
private financial data.  If you "own" land, and are still  paying
on  it,  what can I say?  In any event, know that you  never  did
"own"  it  and  you never will -- you haven't paid  for  it  with
anything of any intrinsic value; a paper dollar has no  intrinsic
value  and therefore no commodity of intrinsic value has  changed
hands,  and therefore no title has changed hands.   Mealy-mouthed
court  rulings  have asserted that paying for land  (or  anything
else,  for that matter) with paper money does not acquire  title;
all it does is "satisfy the obligation to pay" while at the  same
time not transferring title.  Actually, title is in the hands  of
the  occupation  government;  you are  allowed  to  "manage"  the
property  so  long as you pay an annual leasehold rental  in  the
form  of  "property taxes," which aren't legal under  common  law
ownership.   (When our money was gold and silver coin,  THEN  you
could lawfully acquire all right, title, and interest in  proper
ty.)

    Get  involved  in political protests against  government  and
quasi-government  intrusion  into private rights.   For  example,
April  15th next (April Fool's Day) there will be political  ral
lies and picketing at post offices around the country to  protest
the grip the Illegal Racketeering Service (IRS) has on our  coun
try.   Contact National Commodity & Barter Association,  8000  E.
Girard  Avenue, #215, Denver, CO 80231, 1-303-337-9617,  for  de
tails, and ask for a copy of THE PETITIONER.

    Write letters to politicians.  Be polite, DON'T THREATEN, but
make  it  clear that We, the People have had it up to  here  with
this  illegal occupation government and the Plans it has for  us,
and that you intend to re-elect NO ONE!

    Do that:  'Next Fall, Fire 'Em All:  RE-ELECT NOBODY!

    Start  thinking about measures you can take to  protect  your
firearms from confiscation, in terms of hiding them, etc.

    If caught doing something you have a right to do but  govern
ment  doesn't like, STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS!  Don't  acknowledge
anyone's authority over YOUR RIGHTS.  They are YOURS -- they  are
your  property, and no one else's, and if you don't stand up  for
them it's a darned cinch no one else will.

    One  example  of what I mean is a traffic  ticket.   I  don't
recommend  this  procedure with traffic tickets because  we  have
bigger  fish  to  fry, but it gives you an  idea  how  government
works, and it works this way EVERY TIME it wants to separate  you
from  your rights:  The cop will give you the ticket book so  you
can sign the ticket.  He'll tell you this is NOT AN ADMISSION  OF
GUILT,  but  is merely a promise to appear in court  or  pay  the
fine.   He is being truthful when he says it is not an  admission
of  guilt,  but  he is lying to you when he says  it's  'only'  a
promise to appear or pay the fine.

    It's  not an admission of guilt, but it IS a  contract  which
indicates  you  are volunteering under his authority  at  Equity,
where  you  haven't  ANY RIGHTS AT ALL if the  judge  decides  to
ignore  your  rights.  You're under contract; the  purpose  of  a
contract is to waive some rights in exchange for some  considera
tion of value (in this case, the 'privilege' of travelling  about
in the commonly-accepted mode of transportation of the day.)

    As  I  say, doing this with a traffic ticket is  a  VERY  BIG
HASSLE  for a very minor return; if we win on the big issues  the
little  ones  like this will fall apart anyway.  But if  you  are
being  railroaded,  this is a way to make it expensive  for  them
(and you).

    Maybe,  just maybe -- it is hoping against  overwhelming  de
spair, but MAYBE, if enough people wise up, research the REAL law
in this country, and start handing out Constitutions and Declara
tions  of Independence and JURY HANDBOOKS, and start REFUSING  TO
COOPERATE with illegal government, and STOP GIVING UP, well . . .
MAYBE  the  land of the free and home of the brave will  stand  a
half  chance  of  surviving with something of  what  our  country
stands  for intact.  But know this:  we have already  passed  the
point  at  which  government figures it can get  away  with  just
mowing  down  mobs with machine guns if it wants to.   It  hasn't
happened yet, but I think it eventually will, just like Tiananman
Square.  I know government figures it has a right to do it now if
it  feels the need.  The longer we let government proceed in  the
direction  it  is now headed, the more confident it  will  become
that  it  can  do anything it wants to do "in  the  interests  of
'national security.'"

    Read,  research, spend your hard-earned money on  underground
political publications, and gird your loins for a fight,  because
if  you  don't you might as well just roll over now.   You  won't
even get thanked.

------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan archives by the archive maintainer.


All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])